Food
irradiation is one means of food preservation that may not be familiar to many,
but it has been in development since the early decades of the twentieth
century. If properly applied, irradiation can be an effective way to treat a
variety of problems in our food supply, such as insect infestation of grains,
sprouting of potatoes, rapid ripening of fruits and bacterial growth. However,
it has not yet obtained a significant place in the U.S. food industry. This
apparent hesitancy is caused in part by very vocal and active opponents who
provide inaccurate information to instill fear about food safety into the
public's minds. Many factors of economic feasibility seem to hinge on food
industry as well as consumer acceptance, and in turn, have hindered the
potential for widespread commercial success of food irradiation.
Radiation is not a modern, man-made creation. We get natural radiation
from the sun and other natural components of our environment such as gases and
deposits of uranium ore in rock structures. In the 1890s, radioactive
substances and X-rays were discovered. Intense research about the biological
effects of these radiations began immediately and beneficial uses of these
substances were soon found. The biggest contribution of man's use of radiation
has been in the medical field -- medical and dental X-rays, detection and
treatment of diseases, sterilization of medical equipment, medical devices,
pharmaceutical products, and home products, and production of sterilized food
for special hospital diets. It is also interesting to note that for many years
precious stones have been irradiated to increase their brilliance, as with
diamonds, or to change their appearance, as with topaz, in which irradiation
produces a smoky-like appearance in the crystal.
Despite these known benefits of irradiation and the technologies to
control its use, consumer acceptance and concern for nuclear issues have
hindered the potential for widespread commercial success in this country.
However, more than 30 countries have approved and are using food irradiation
technologies to ensure food safety. Countries utilizing food irradiation for
various purposes include Japan, China, the Soviet Union, the Netherlands and
France. In the U.S., irradiated foods have been used by astronauts, the
military and hospital patients, but the adoption of the technology for other
purposes has been slow despite approvals from the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). For example, the process to control trichinosis in pork, approved in
1985, is still not used. With the recent approval of irradiation for
controlling bacteria on red meats, attention was again focused on food
irradiation. The U.S. may be the closest it has ever been to seeing irradiation
accepted for more widespread use, due to recent outbreaks from E.
ColiO157:H7.
History of the Irradiation
Preservation of Food
Early
in the 1920s, a French scientist discovered that irradiation could be used to
preserve food. This technology was not adopted in the U.S. until World War II.
At this time there was a need to feed millions of men and women in uniform. The
U.S. Army sponsored a series of experiments with fruits, vegetables, dairy
products, fish and meats. In 1963, the U.S. saw its first approval of food
irradiation when FDA approved its use to control insects in wheat and wheat
flour. In 1964, additional approval was given to inhibit the development of
sprouts in white potatoes.
In 1983, approval was granted to kill insects and control microorganisms
in a specific list of herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings. (The approved
list of food products has been increased with later changes.) Then, in 1985,
treatment of pork to control trichinosis was added to the list of approvals. In
the same year, approval was granted to control insects and microorganisms in
dry enzyme preparations used in fermentation-type processes. In 1986, approval
was granted to control insects and inhibit growth and ripening in such foods as
fruits, vegetables and grains.
Approval was granted in May, 1990, for irradiation of packaged fresh or
frozen uncooked poultry. FDA supports it as an effective control of
microorganisms responsible for a major portion of foodborne illness, including
Salmonella, Yersinia, and Campylobacter. This approval was the first approved
process to "pasteurize" solid foods, such as poultry. The process
reduces but does not eliminate all bacteria. Therefore, processed poultry are
safe longer than unprocessed poultry, but still require refrigeration.
The latest approval for irradiation in the U.S. was granted in December
1997, for red meat. A maximum dose of 4.5 KGy was approved for uncooked,
chilled red meat and meat product, and 7.0 KGy for frozen red meat and
products. These approvals are for the purpose of controlling microorganisms,
including pathogens such as E. Coli 0157:H7. Just as
with irradiated poultry, irradiated red meats still require refrigeration or
freezing. Higher doses that sterilize frozen and packaged meats were approved
in 1995 for use by NASA only. Legislation to allow the irradiation of seafood
is being developed.
What is
"Irradiation?"
Just
a mention of the word irradiation usually sparks strong objections, usually
based on misunderstanding of the process involved and its effects on foods.
Very simply, food irradiation is a process of exposing foods, either
prepackaged or in bulk, to very high-energy, invisible lightwaves (radiation).
The process controls the amount of radiation the food absorbs.
Food irradiation is a means of preservation; it is used to extend
product shelf life. The radiation energy used is able to cause changes in
molecules, such as breaking chemical bonds. At small irradiation doses,
properties of the food, such as sprouting and ripening can be modified (usually
inhibited). Higher doses can alter molecules in microorganisms so they can no
longer cause spoilage or human illness. The microorganisms may be killed or
genetically altered so they can't reproduce. It takes lower doses to damage
microorganisms and insects than to alter enough molecules in the food to damage
it.
For those who want to know more about the radiation that is used and its
relationship to other types of energy, it is necessary to look at the
electromagnetic spectrum. Food irradiation uses gamma rays, X-rays or electron
beams that are part of the invisible lightwaves range of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Ultraviolet light (radiation) is also in the invisible range of the spectrum,
although the waves of ultraviolet light are not as short as those of X-rays and
gamma rays. The shorter the wavelength, the greater the amount of energy per
unit.
High energy radiation can break molecules into smaller fragments that
may be either electrically charged (ions) or neutral. The electrically charged
ions are radioactive. Ultraviolet, X-ray and gamma radiation can break stronger
bonds than visible light and even expel electrons from atoms. This is why they
may also be called ionizing radiation or ionizing energy.
Other types of radiant energy with longer wavelengths and less energy
per unit are infrared and microwave radiation. Thus, conventional cooking
methods such as broiling and baking also use radiant energy, but in the
infrared range. Cooking with microwaves is accomplished by microwave radiation,
energy of yet another wavelength. Microwave radiation is also used to detect
speeding cars, to send television and telephone communications, to treat muscle
soreness, to dry and cure plywood and to raise bread and doughnuts.
Sources of
Radiation (Ionizing Energy)
There
are three types of energy that can be used for irradiation of food: X-rays,
electron beams and gamma rays. Machines called "electron
accelerators" are used to produce beams of electrons to which food can be
exposed. If the electrons from the accelerator are stopped by a metal target
(such as tungsten foil) first, X-rays are produced and the food is exposed to
X-rays. The amount of energy produced by electron beams can be adjusted.
Gamma rays are produced by radioactive substances (called radioisotopes)
that continuously emit the high energy gamma rays. The approved sources of
gamma rays for food irradiation are cobalt- 60 (the most common) and
cesium-137.
Doses and Effects
of Radiation
In
food irradiation, the radiation "dose" that a food receives should
not be confused with something added to the food. The "dose" for food
irradiation is the amount of radiation absorbed by the food and it is not the
same as the level of energy transmitted from the radiation sources. The dose is
controlled by the intensity of radiation and the length of time the food is
exposed.
Terms used to describe this "dose" or amount of absorbed
radiation, are unfamiliar and confusing to most people. In the past, the term
used was rad, short for "radiation absorbed dose," which is 100 ergs
absorbed by 1 gram of matter. The rad has been replaced by the gray (Gy). One
gray is equal to 100 rads or 0.00024 Calorie (i.e., diet calorie) per kilogram
of food. (0.00024 Calorie per kilogram equals 0.0001 Calorie per pound.) The
FDA's regulations describe radiation levels in terms of the kilogray (kGy),
equal to 1000 Gy.
The dose (number of kGy) permitted varies according to the type of food
and the desired action. Treatment levels have been approved by FDA as follows:
- "Low" doses - (up to 1 kGy) designed to
- control insects in grains
- inhibit sprouting in white potatoes
- control trichinae in pork
- inhibit decay and control insects in fruits and vegetables
- "Medium" doses - (1-10 kGy) designed to
- control Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia and E. Coli in meat, poultry and fish
- delay mold growth on strawberries and other fruits
- "High" doses - (greater than 10 kGy) designed to
- kill microorganisms and insects in spices
- commercially sterilize foods, destroying all microorganisms of public health concern (e.g., to sterilize food to the same degree as if they were thermally sterilized (canned); however, no commercial applications of this dosage have been approved by FDA for use in the U.S. with the exception of some special hospital diets for immune-deficient patients.)
When radiation energy is absorbed by food, it causes a variety of
chemical and physical reactions. The amount of energy the food absorbs is
controlled so the changes produced have desirable food preservation effects
while maintaining the safety, quality, and wholesomeness of the food. The food
itself does not become radioactive.
Perishable foods treated with all but high doses, however, must still be
refrigerated. Refrigerated storage life is extended, but the need for cold
storage is not replaced by irradiation. Microorganisms are destroyed by
radiation more easily than enzymes which lead to food deterioration (color,
flavor and texture changes, for example). Many enzymes survive the current
levels of radiation processing, although refrigeration can slow down many
enzymatic changes. In addition, not all microorganisms are destroyed. The
process does not protect the food against reinfestation or contamination.
Therefore, irradiated perishable foods are still considered perishable.
Facilities
Facilities
for irradiating food are similar to those in operation for sterilizing medical
equipment and do not resemble nuclear reactors in any way. There are no
explosives or materials that could cause widespread dissemination of
radioactive material. Facilities using cobalt do not use materials from nuclear
defense industries. Facilities used, however, must comply with plant and worker
safety requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration.
At
an irradiation facility, the radiation source (usually the cobalt-60) is
contained in slender pencil- like stainless steel casing about 18 inches long
by 3/8 inch diameter. The casings, in turn, are contained in a lead-lined
chamber. Packaged food travels in pallets on a conveyor between 6-1/2 foot
thick concrete walls into and through a chamber where it is exposed to the
radiation source (gamma rays if cobalt-60 is used). Pallets may be turned to
allow uniform exposure over the route. Radiation dosage is controlled by a
computerized rate of passage (conveyor speed) through the chamber.
As of June 1989, there were three facilities in the U.S. which
irradiated food on a commercial scale. Those in operation have been facilities
for sterilizing medical and other supplies, and who sometimes divert to
irradiate bulk loads of spices. One hospital in Seattle is approved for
irradiating special diets for immune-deficient patients mentioned previously.
Adoption of the
Technology
Although
some food radiation treatments have been approved in the U.S. since 1963, there
has been only infrequent use in test markets other than use on spices. The food
industry is slow to invest in this technology because of uncertainty over the
public acceptance of food. In 1986, 2 metric tons of mangoes irradiated in
Puerto Rico were test marketed in Miami, FL. In 1987, irradiated Hawaiian
papaya were tested in Anaheim and Irvine, CA. These test market studies as well
as others in France, Argentina and South Africa indicated good consumer
acceptance and willingness to buy.
Worldwide, over 30 countries approve some form of irradiation and many
groups of consumers readily accept these products. As of 1986, Japan irradiated
over 10,000 pounds of potatoes annually. The Netherlands irradiated 2 tons of
food daily, and Belgium irradiated 1 ton daily. South Africa routinely
irradiates mangoes, papaya, and other vegetables. Canada has a facility
dedicated to irradiating potatoes.
Labeling of
Irradiated Foods
Because the
beneficial effects of irradiating foods are not discernable to consumers,
labeling has been considered essential if consumers are to be adequately
informed. After much debate, the FDA approved initial labeling requirements in
April, 1986. The regulations required that all produce be labeled at the
packing/wholesale and retail levels. Suggested wording and an international
symbol (logo) were provided.
At the retail level, the label was required to bear the symbol plus one
of these statements: "treated with radiation" or "treated by
irradiation." In addition, the manufacturer was allowed to add a phrase
which truthfully described the primary purpose of the treatment, such as
"treated with radiation to control spoilage." For unpackaged fruits
and vegetables, labels could be on each piece, on the shipping container placed
in prominent consumer view, or on a sign near the commodities identifying the
use of the treatment.
For irradiated foods sold at the wholesale level, the logo and the
wording were still required. In addition, however, they were to be accompanied
by the caution "do not irradiate again." Irradiated spices sold in
the U.S. do not need to carry the logo if they are in packaged foods where they
constitute one small ingredient. Most packaged spices in stores are usually
treated by chemical fumigation, not by irradiation. New legislation in November
1997 (The FDA Modernization Act of 1997, Public Law 105-115) contained food
provisions that direct FDA to review its labeling rule for irradiated foods.
The agency was told to revise the rule so the disclosure statement is not more
prominent than the declaration of ingredients. The ruling does not, however,
exclude making a disclosure of irradiation through use of the radura.
Safety of
Irradiated Foods
Irradiated
food does not become radioactive. At the radiation energy levels used in food
processing, only chemical changes are possible, not nuclear changes that would
make the food itself radioactive. Over 35 years of research suggest that the
chemical by-products of radiation ("radiolytic products") are mostly
the same as by-products of conventional cooking or other preservation methods.
Animal feeding studies show no toxic, teratogenic or mutagenic effects from
irradiated foods. In addition, irradiation leaves no chemical residues in food.
In 1981, the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United
Nations, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the World Health
Organization concluded that "any food irradiated up to an average dose of
1 Mrad or less is wholesome for humans and therefore should be approved without
further testing" (WHO, 1981 in IFT, 1987). (A Mrad equals 10 kGy.) Also in
1981, the U.S. FDA concluded that food irradiated with up to 1 kGy is
"wholesome and safe for human consumption, even where the food that is
irradiated may constitute a substantial portion of the diet," and that
food "compromising no more than 0.01% of the daily diet [ex., spices] and
irradiated at 50 kGy or less also can be considered safe for human
consumption" (FDA, 1981).
Before approving low dose irradiation of foods, the FDA reviewed over
400 toxicity studies, which included animal feeding studies. The U.S. Army
Medical Department fed irradiated foods to 41 human volunteers in 15-day tests
in 1955-58 and showed no unfavorable effects. More recently, in 1986, the
People's Republic of China reported on eight experiments with 439 human volunteers.
Their diets included 60% of ingredients irradiated at levels from 0.1-8 kGy.
During and after these trials, there were no significant differences in the
clinical, physiological and biochemical evaluations between the subjects
receiving the irradiated foods and those receiving comparable food without such
processing.
Changes in
Irradiated Food
Food
irradiation is sometimes called a "cold" process; it achieves its
effect with little rise in the temperature of the food. There is little if any
change in the physical appearance of irradiated foods as they do not undergo
the changes in texture and/or color as foods preserved by heat pasteurization,
canning or freezing. Food remains close to its original state. Problems that
have occurred are some off-flavors in meat and excess tissue softening that has
been documented in fresh peaches and nectarines.
As with all preservation or cooking methods, some chemical changes occur
in irradiated food. When high energy particles strike matter, electrons are
lost from atoms and ions are formed. Newly formed radiolytic products may then
interact to create new compounds in the food that were not present before
treatment, a few of which could produce off- flavors. (In meat, this can be
partly controlled by maintaining low product temperatures during the
irradiation process.) The most common chemical reaction during food irradiation
is the conversion of water to hydrogen peroxide. Reactions like these occur in
all types of food preservation, and those few reactions unique to irradiation
are not harmful.
The FDA concluded that "very few of these radiolytic products are
unique to irradiated foods; approximately 90% of the radiolytic products...are
known to be natural components of food" (FDA, 1986). Some of these are
fatty acids just like those that result from the breakdown of triglycerides,
amino acids that make up proteins, and compounds (hydrocarbons) commonly found
in the waxy coverings of fruits like apples, pears and berries. Others are
fatty compounds just like those found from cooking meat by common methods such
as grilling. The other 10% of radiolytic compounds are chemically very similar
to natural components in food. The chemistry of irradiation is very predictable
and the products of an individual component such as proteins are not affected
by the type of food or other food components present. Radiolytic products have
been critically tested for toxicity and no evidence of hazard has been found.
Radiation does not impair activity of certain nutrients, but overall nutrient
retention in irradiated foods is similar to retention with other preservation
methods. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) reduction has been reported, but it is
attributed to a shift from ascorbic acid to dehydroascorbic acid, a change that
is mostly insignificant from a nutritional standpoint. Tocopherol, which have
Vitamin E activity, appear to be very sensitive to irradiation in the presence
of oxygen. Vitamin K seems relatively stable. These adverse effects of
irradiation on vitamins can be reduced by excluding oxygen and light, keeping
the food at a low temperature, and using the lowest dose need for treating
(processing) food.
Consumer Acceptance
Studies
on consumer acceptance have been done with a few irradiated products. Bruhn,
Schutz and Sommer (1986) examined change in consumer attitudes toward food
irradiation as the result of opportunities to read about and discuss the
technology. They found that consumers in general showed a higher level of
concern for preservatives and sprays than for food irradiation.
"Alternative" consumers who were a vocal segment of ecologically
sensitive consumers, were more skeptical about the safety and advantages of the
process. They also were initially more aware of food irradiation and their
concern increased after educational efforts. After educational efforts,
conventional consumers adopted a minor concerned attitude toward irradiation,
but a discussion leader knowledgeable in food irradiation reduced concerns of
conventional consumers compared with the impact of a non-expert leader. These
researchers concluded that the attitudes of conventional consumers can be
positively influenced by an educational effort and the influence is most
effective when the consumer can interact with someone knowledgeable about
irradiation.
Wiese Research Associates (1984) found that less than 25% of a national
telephone sample were aware of food irradiation technologies. Among those
aware, 75% were concerned, but in general, consumers were more concerned about
chemical sprays and preservatives than irradiation. Those with fewer concerns
had more formal education and higher levels of awareness.
A market survey of the effects of irradiation on demand for papaya in
California in the 1960s suggested that demand would be reduced by 23% if the
fruit were treated with irradiation (Huang, et.al., 1987). Acceptance of
irradiated produce is quite high in South Africa. Reportedly, 90% of consumers
reacted positively to its introduction in the late 1970s. However, the test
marketing was accompanied by an extensive educational campaign that involved
mass media and supportive consumer organizations (Bruhn, et.al., 1986). A 1992
study revealed that consumers were willing to pay up to $0.81 more per meal to
eliminate risk of foodborne illness. This is 10 times more expensive than the
actual cost of irradiating food (Olson, 1997).
Even though some test marketing has shown some hope for consumer
acceptance, irradiated foods have caused picketing and violent protests in the
past. Consumer studies seem to suggest that people are more interested in the
safety and wholesomeness of the foods rather than benefits of the process for
any specific foods. These and other findings also seem to indicate that as
knowledge and awareness of the technologies increase, so might its acceptance.
History indicates that consumer acceptance will continue to influence the
extent to which irradiation gets adopted as an alternative food processing
technology.
Summary
There is no doubt that food irradiation involves
many complex issues. If properly applied, irradiation can be an effective
method of reducing organisms which cause food spoilage and human illness. Some
benefits of food irradiation include:
Reduction of postharvest losses (less
foodwaste);
Reduction of chemical residues in
foods (could replace fumigants and other pesticides)
Reduction of risks of foodborne
illness from bacteria (Salmonella, Campylobacter and Shigella)
Reduction of the risk of trichinosis
from pork;
More appealing "fresh"
characteristics for foods because it is a relatively "cold" process
and foods closely resemble those in their fresh state.
The potential benefits of food irradiation may come closer to
realization now that regulatory barriers are beginning to be removed, interest
in alternatives to pesticides is high and some studies are demonstrating
consumer acceptance of products. See Table 1 for clearances as
of August, 1988, for use of ionizing energy on foods in the United States.
Table 1. Summary of
Approved Food Irradiation Processes
Date
|
Food/Product
|
Dose (kGy)*
|
Purpose
|
|
|||
1963
|
Wheat
and wheat flour
|
0.2 -
0.5
|
Disinfestation
of insects
|
1964,
1965
|
White
potatoes
|
0.05 -
0.15
|
Inhibit
sprouting (and extend shelf life)
|
1983
|
Spices
and dry vegetable seasonings (38 commodities)
|
30
maximum
|
Disinfestation
of insects and decontamination
|
1985
|
Pork
(carcasses or fresh, non-heat processed cuts)
|
0.3 -
1.0
|
Control
of Trichinella spiralis
|
1985,
1986
|
Dry or
dehydrated enzymes
|
10
maximum
|
Control
of insects and/or microorganisms
|
1986
|
Fruit
|
1
maximum
|
Delay
of maturation (ripening) and disinfestation
|
1986
|
Fresh
vegetables
|
1
maximum
|
Disinfestation
of insects
|
1986
|
Herbs
|
30
maximum
|
Control
of microorganisms (decontamination)
|
1986
|
Spices
|
30
maximum
|
Control
of microorganisms
|
1986
|
Vegetable
seasonings
|
30
maximum
|
Control
of microorganisms
|
1990
|
Poultry,
fresh or frozen
|
3
maximum
|
Control
of microorganisms (includingSalmonella)
|
1995
|
Meat,
frozen and packaged
(solely for use in NASA) |
44
minimum
|
Sterilization
(destruction of microorganisms)
|
1995
|
Animal
feed and pet food
|
2 - 25
|
Control
of Salmonella
|
1997
|
Red
meat, uncooked, chilled
Red meat, frozen |
4.5
maximum
7.0 maximum |
Control
of microorganisms
|
No comments:
Post a Comment